Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the Xperia Z3+, getting a 97.6 score against 73.7. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, so it provides you lots of additional features. Galaxy Fold's construction has the same thickness than the Xperia Z3+, but it is incredibly heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a better CPU than Xperia Z3+, because it has more CPU cores and 9 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia Z3+ counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more memory for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. The Sony Xperia Z3+ captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia Z3+ also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and a camera in the back with a lot better 20.7 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold features a much better battery life than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 49% larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia Z3+. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and buy the Xperia Z3+, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.