Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-05-26 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is slightly better than the Xperia Z3+, getting a 78.9 score against 73.7. Galaxy M20's construction is notably newer, but way heavier and notably thicker than Xperia Z3+. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy M20 has a newer 10 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, providing the user some extra features.
Xperia Z3+ has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy M20 features just a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a greater number of cores (although they are slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia Z3+ shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a lot higher video quality.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a much better battery life than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.