Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the Xperia Z3+'s score of 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 has 13 version and Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy S20 body is extremely newer than Xperia Z3+'s, although it's heavier and thicker.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better processor than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has more cores and a greater amount of RAM. Xperia Z3+ and Galaxy S20 count with incredibly similar displays, although the Galaxy S20 also has more pixels per display inch, a larger display and a much higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Xperia Z3+, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and a way better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a really longer battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xperia Z3+. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xperia Z3+, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.