Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-05-26 | -- |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 5.08 ounces | -- |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than the Xperia Z3+, with a general score of 82.6 against 73.7. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a thinner and way lighter cellphone than the Xperia Z3+. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, so it gives you lots of additional features.
The Xperia Z3+ features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a little bit better display than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia Z3+, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a much better battery life than Xperia Z3+, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2930mAh.
Galaxy S25 shoots much better pictures and videos than Xperia Z3+, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way larger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Sony Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Sony Xperia Z3+. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Sony Xperia Z3+, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.