Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | -- |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.37 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a global score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than Xperia Z3+'s general score of 73.7. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has the newer 12 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and performance improvements. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a noticeably newer device than the Xperia Z3+, although it's extremely heavier and a lot thicker.
Xperia Z3+ has a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 7 lesser processing cores and 3 GB less RAM. The Xperia Z3+ features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display pixels density.
Sony Xperia Z3+ takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and video in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with a much lower 20.7 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior battery performance than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.