Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Sony Xperia Z3+'s overall score of 73.7. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer cellphone than Sony Xperia Z3+, but it's much heavier and notably thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior CPU than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Xperia Z3+ and Galaxy XCover FieldPro have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per screen inch.
Xperia Z3+ has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z3+, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2930mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z3+. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Xperia Z3+, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.