Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Black |
| Glass; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than Xperia Z3+'s 73.7 score. Even though Galaxy XCover Pro is incredibly newer than the Xperia Z3+, it's noticeably heavier and way thicker. These devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0.
Xperia Z3+ features a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior performance than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia Z3+ shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lesser MP camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia Z3+, because it has 32 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a superior battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia Z3+. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Xperia Z3+, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.