Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Sony Xperia Z3+, having an 85.6 score against 73.7. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a much heavier cellphone than Sony Xperia Z3+, but they are equally thin. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a more recent 11 version while Sony Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version, so it provides you lots of additional features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a better processing unit than Sony Xperia Z3+, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Sony Xperia Z3+ counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display.
Xperia Z3+ features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit longer battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xperia Z3+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia Z3+. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, else you can save some money and buy the Xperia Z3+, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.