Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-05-26 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.76 x 2.83 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Brown, Green and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum |
| $ 170.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2930mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 590 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is way better than Xperia Z3+'s overall score of 73.7. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer phone than the Xperia Z3+, although it is a little bit thicker and notably heavier. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Xperia Z3+ has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better performing CPU than Xperia Z3+, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM. Xperia Z3+ has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a really smaller screen, a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z3+, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Xperia Z3+ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia Z3+ also counts with a camera with a way higher 20.7 megapixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xperia Z3+, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Sony Xperia Z3+, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.