Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 469 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 3 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 80.7, which is better than Xperia Z4 Compact's 70 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison have the same Android 5.0 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user all the same OS features. Xperia Z4 Compact has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have a 600 megahertz graphics processing unit and 8 cpu cores, the Xperia Z4 Compact also has 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU.
Xperia Z4 Compact counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, the Xperia Z4 Compact also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia Z4 Compact, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB and more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit better battery performance than Xperia Z4 Compact, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4 Compact, although it has a much worse 13 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.