Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than Xperia Z4v's overall score of 78.8. The Apple iPhone X design is extremely newer and thinner than Xperia Z4v's, but it's also a bit heavier. Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit more vivid display than iPhone X, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Apple iPhone X has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone X counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor and less processing cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Sony Xperia Z4v captures a bit better pictures and videos than iPhone X, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xperia Z4v features just a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia Z4v. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xperia Z4v, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.