Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than Xperia Z4v's overall score of 78.8. Google Pixel's body has the same thickness than Xperia Z4v, but it's somewhat lighter. The Xperia Z4v features a more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a little bigger display and a better pixel density.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a graphics co-processor. Xperia Z4v has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 0.43 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xperia Z4v also has a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Google Pixel features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Xperia Z4v features a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it is more expensive than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xperia Z4v. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia Z4v, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.