Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Sony Xperia Z4v's score of 78.8. Google Pixel 3a is a newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and a bit thinner than Sony Xperia Z4v. These phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version and Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Xperia Z4v features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Xperia Z4v features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a much more MP back camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Sony Xperia Z4v has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 3a has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery life in Xperia Z4v.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3a is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.