Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Xperia Z4v's general score of 78.8. Although the Google Pixel 4 is just a little bit heavier than the Xperia Z4v, it's just a bit thinner and extremely newer. Xperia Z4v features a much better display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory.
Xperia Z4v counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way better resolution back camera.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs more money than Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia Z4v. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Xperia Z4v, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.