Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 6a's global score of 76.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version. The Xperia Z4v is an noticeably older phone than Google Pixel 6a, but it is lighter and a little thinner anyway.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has an incredibly better display than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Google Pixel 6a counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has an extremely better CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a greater number of cores. The Sony Xperia Z4v has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Google Pixel 6a features a very superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4410mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xperia Z4v is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.