Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-16 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.64 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v, having an 82.2 score against 78.8. These devices include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a more recent 14 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with some extra features. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) construction is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than Xperia Z4v.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much greater hardware performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra GPU. The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much sharper display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.
Sony Xperia Z4v takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.