Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Xperia Z4v's 78.8 general score. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is notably newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xperia Z4v. These phones work with Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has the newer 10 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1.
The LG G8X ThinQ features just a little better processing power than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have 8 cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xperia Z4v has a brighter display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better screen density.
The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a way better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G8X ThinQ has improved battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.