Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v, with an 81.3 score against 78.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a way newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than the Xperia Z4v. LG V35 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with 3 GB more RAM.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. Sony Xperia Z4v has a slightly better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.