Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Xperia Z4v, with a score of 87.6 against 78.8. LG V60 ThinQ is a extremely newer phone than Xperia Z4v, but it is notably heavier and just a bit thicker. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, so it gives some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also counts with more RAM. The Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel number per inch of screen.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much worse 20.7 MP resolution back camera, a tinier camera aperture, a lot lower 3840x2160 video definition and a much tinier back camera sensor which offers a much worse image and video quality. The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.