Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Xperia Z4v, with an 87.1 score against 78.8. LG Velvet is a a lot newer and a little thinner phone than the Xperia Z4v, but it is heavier. Sony Xperia Z4v features a bit better processing power than LG Velvet, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The LG Velvet shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments, a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet features a very superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs a little more than the Sony Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.