Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a general score of 81.5, which is a little bit better than Xperia Z4v's general score of 78.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G 5G has a newer 10 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1. Moto G 5G's construction is notably newer than Xperia Z4v's, but it's thicker and notably heavier.
Xperia Z4v counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Xperia Z4v counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
The Moto G 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.