Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Xperia Z4v, with an 86.2 score against 78.8. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but Moto G200 5G has a newer 11 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The Moto G200 5G design is extremely newer than Xperia Z4v's, although it is incredibly heavier and a little thicker.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with 5 GB more RAM. The Xperia Z4v features a sharper display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count in each inch of display and a slightly better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much better photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture and a much better resolution camera.
The Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.