Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is a little bit better than Moto Z Force, with a 78.8 score against 75.8. Despite of the fact the Xperia Z4v is older and thicker than Moto Z Force, it's body is still a little lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Xperia Z4v features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores and a graphics co-processor. Sony Xperia Z4v features a better looking display than Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a little better pixel quantity in each display inch.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a worse (4K) video resolution, a lesser megapixels resolution camera and a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations. The Moto Z Force has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto Z Force counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Xperia Z4v not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.