Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-06-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3, having a overall score of 78.8 against 77.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Xperia Z4v design is way older, incredibly thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Motorola Moto Z3.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a much better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
The Xperia Z4v counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics processing unit. Sony Xperia Z4v has just a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F2 aperture, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Moto Z3 has a battery life that is just as good as the Xperia Z4v one.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xperia Z4v is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.