Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 overall score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, it must be told that it's also way older, way thicker and just a bit heavier. The Xperia Z4v counts with a lot better screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Moto Z3 Play has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Moto Z3 Play and Xperia Z4v both feature similar battery performance. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Sony Xperia Z4v is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.