Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and White | Sonic silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's score of 76.2. Even though Sony Xperia Z4v is extremely older than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is extremely lighter and thinner. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Sony Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version.
Xperia Z4v has a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better display pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster processor than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a much larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Xperia Z4v not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.