Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has a score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Although the Xperia Z4v is a lot older and thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's construction is still a little lighter. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Xperia Z4v has the older 5.1 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little better processing power than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 34% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.