Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while OPPO Find X3 Neo has Android 11 version. Although the Xperia Z4v is incredibly older and just a little thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's construction is still lighter.
The Xperia Z4v has a slightly better display than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater pixel number per inch of screen. OPPO Find X3 Neo features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo captures slightly better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has better video frame rates, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Xperia Z4v is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.