Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Oppo |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 78.8 against 77. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Xperia Z4v has older 5.1 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11 version. Xperia Z4v's design is somewhat thicker but just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Xperia Z4v has a more vivid display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xperia Z4v has a very superior battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a camera with a much better resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.