Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Sony Xperia Z4v's 78.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is incredibly newer and a little bit thinner than the Sony Xperia Z4v's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Xperia Z4v features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy A52 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a really longer battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.