Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism bricks black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the newer 10 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat heavier than the Xperia Z4v, it's a bit thinner and also extremely newer.
Xperia Z4v counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW and Sony Xperia Z4v both have very similar processing units, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a superior camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than the Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.