Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v, having an 84.6 score against 78.8. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has 12 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. Samsung Galaxy F23 is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also a bit thinner and extremely lighter than Xperia Z4v.
Xperia Z4v features a bit better CPU than Galaxy F23, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra GPU. The Xperia Z4v counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Galaxy F23 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy F23 counts with a very superior battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Xperia Z4v captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images or video in low-light environments and a lot worse resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.