Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xperia Z4v's 78.8 global score. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy F62 construction is a lot newer, but a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than the Xperia Z4v.
Xperia Z4v counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU and a higher number of cores. Xperia Z4v has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 64 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy F62 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.