Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-06-16 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a newer 10 version and Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, counting with lots of additional features and performance optimizations. Although the Samsung Galaxy M20 is noticeably newer than Sony Xperia Z4v, it's heavier and a bit thicker.
Xperia Z4v has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Xperia Z4v features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Sony Xperia Z4v shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor, a lot more mega pixels camera and a lot higher (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy M20 has a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.