Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than Sony Xperia Z4v, getting an 87.7 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a noticeably newer cellphone than Sony Xperia Z4v, although it's way heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has the newer 10 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1.
The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Xperia Z4v counts with a lot better display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Galaxy M51 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M51 also has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia Z4v, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.