Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Xperia Z4v, getting a global score of 98.9 against 78.8. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, so it counts with some extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than the Xperia Z4v's, although it's incredibly heavier.
The Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better hardware performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a lot higher video quality, a lot larger camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia Z4v. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Xperia Z4v, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.