Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than Xperia Z4v's score of 78.8. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner, but also heavier than the Xperia Z4v. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with more RAM.
The Xperia Z4v has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixel count per display inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit more expensive than the Sony Xperia Z4v, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.