Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-16 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.64 ounces | -- |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v, having an 82.6 score against 78.8. Galaxy S25's design is notably lighter and much thinner than the Xperia Z4v. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1. The Xperia Z4v features a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Xperia Z4v and the Galaxy S25 count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy S25 has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a lot lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy S25 captures a lot better pictures and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has a way larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a camera in the back with much more MP and a way better video quality.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia Z4v. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Xperia Z4v, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.