Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 12 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a 78.8 score against 77.6. Although the Xperia Z4v is way older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is much lighter and thinner. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
The Xperia Z4v features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Xperia Z4v features a much sharper display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Sony Xperia Z4v takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels back camera and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.