Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has 11 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is extremely newer and much thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Xperia Z4v.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a bit better processing power than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also counts with more RAM memory. Xperia Z4v has a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Xperia Z4v has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a bit longer battery life than Xperia Z4v, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Sony Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Sony Xperia Z4v. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Sony Xperia Z4v, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.