Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Xperia Z4v, having a 90.6 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is noticeably newer and a lot thinner than Xperia Z4v's, although it is also much heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has 11 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processor than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also counts with a higher amount of RAM. The Xperia Z4v features a way better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Sony Xperia Z4v features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a way better battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 47 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.