Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-16 | -- |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and White | Black Shadow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than the Xperia Z4v, having a 91.1 score against 78.8. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition construction is extremely thinner but heavier than Xperia Z4v.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has 13 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics processor. Sony Xperia Z4v has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a much higher display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a lot more MP back facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Sony Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Sony Xperia Z4v. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Sony Xperia Z4v, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.