Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and White | Blasting black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is better than the Sony Xperia Z4v, getting a 90.1 score against 78.8. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a more recent 10 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro body is extremely newer than the Sony Xperia Z4v's, but it is thicker and heavier.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory. Xperia Z4v has a much better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a better camera than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.