Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than Xperia Z4v, with an 83.8 score against 78.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Xperia Z4v. Sony Xperia Z4v has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit superior processor than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also counts with 5 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Xperia Z4v counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xperia Z4v, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xperia Z4v. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xperia Z4v, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.