Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-06-16 | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Xperia Z4v's 78.8 score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than Xperia Z4v. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with more RAM.
Sony Xperia Z4v has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixel density. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit superior battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.