Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-06-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is slightly better than the Xperia Z4v's general score of 78.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T construction is much newer than the Xperia Z4v's, but it is heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has newer 10 version while Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1 version, counting with some nice extra features.
The Sony Xperia Z4v has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with a graphics co-processor. Xperia Z4v has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a larger camera sensor taking higher quality pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.