Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-09-02 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 425.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, having a general score of 81.3 against 75.1. The LG V35 ThinQ body is incredibly newer and thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a lot higher display pixel density, a much bigger screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia Z5 Compact features just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.