Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Blue and White |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 425.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is better than the Xperia Z5 Compact, having an 87.6 score against 75.1. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Xperia Z5 Compact has Android 5.1, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. The LG V60 ThinQ is a much heavier phone than the Xperia Z5 Compact, but both of them have the same thickness.
Xperia Z5 Compact counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a really smaller screen, a little lower screen pixel density and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
Xperia Z5 Compact shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower (4K) video quality, a much tinier back camera sensor giving a way worse image quality and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture. LG V60 ThinQ features much more storage to install games and applications than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery duration than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.