Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Smoke black |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 425.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is slightly better than Xperia Z5 Compact, having a 76.1 score against 75.1. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Power has 11 version while Xperia Z5 Compact has Android 5.1. Even though the Moto G Power is a lot newer than Xperia Z5 Compact, it is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Xperia Z5 Compact features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia Z5 Compact also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Xperia Z5 Compact has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a way smaller display, a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xperia Z5 Compact takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia Z5 Compact also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Moto G Power features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power has a much better battery lifetime than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has an 85 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Moto G Power is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.