Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.00 x 2.56 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 425.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 520 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.64 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact's overall score of 75.1. The Galaxy F62 design is extremely newer, but a lot heavier and a little bit thicker than the Sony Xperia Z5 Compact. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while Sony Xperia Z5 Compact has Android 5.1, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Xperia Z5 Compact features a little faster CPU than Galaxy F62, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores and an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy F62 and Sony Xperia Z5 Compact count with incredibly similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a bit greater display density, a lot larger display and a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Xperia Z5 Compact, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a way larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a back camera with way more MP.
Galaxy F62 counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a very superior battery duration than Sony Xperia Z5 Compact, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.